How is war understood in the Realist theoretical tradition Outline

How is war understood in the Realist notional impost - Outline ExampleIt is established in this analysis that the Realist theoretical tradition has been the close pertinent theoretical perspective on the subject of war and involvement in the post-Cold War order in the world. realness is one of the most important positivist theories which focus on secern security and power origin The end of Cold War brought about an inevitable focus on the concept of war and conflict in the study of supranational dealing and several significant theoretical perspectives emerged. It is essential to realize that the realist, liberal, and fore traditions have been the most significant theoretical perspectives dealing with war and conflict in the worldwide transaction theory. Significantly, the realist theoretical tradition of war maintains that there is an enduring propensity for conflict between states in the multinational relations, whereas the liberal theoretical tradition identifies vari ous ways to alleviate the conflictive tendencies and the radical theoretical tradition emphasizes on the of transformation of the entire system of state relations. As Little and Smith (2006) maintain, the realist theoretical tradition was the most dominant theoretical perspective all through the Cold War. ... ures of the American-Soviet rivalry.1 It is pertinent to establish that state security and power above other states are the essential components of the realist theoretical tradition regarding war and conflict. Significantly, naive realism is not a single theory and it has several classifications which evolved considerably during the Cold War period. In an enquiry of how war is understood in the realist theoretical tradition, it becomes evident that the intellectual construct called realism focuses on international anarchy, insecurity, and the state, and it provides an effective way to deal with the contemporary world politics. As it ashes the overriding paradigm in the study of international relations, it is fundamental to analyze how the realist theoretical tradition explains war. Significantly, the realist theoretical tradition relies heavily on the structure of the international system or the distribution of power as the major element in explaining foreign policies and international outcomes. If realism provides a worthwhile explanatory framework, then propositions derived from it should yield insights about state strategies and behavior in light of this shift in the global distribution of power Realism remains a powerful and valuable explanatory framework, the end of the Cold War notwithstanding.2 Therefore, it is important to come that the role of the realist theoretical tradition remains unquestioned even in the contemporary international relations and world politics, and an analysis of the realist interpretation of the concept of war is most warranted. Scope of the Study In a world threatened by the realities of war in spite of the existence of several theoretical frameworks for international relations, it is fundamental to be aware of the